• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
HU Xiong-yu, YANG Qing-hao, HE Chuan, CAO Song-yu. Experimental study on behaviors of segment linings in an anisotropically jointed rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1773-1781. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201810003
Citation: HU Xiong-yu, YANG Qing-hao, HE Chuan, CAO Song-yu. Experimental study on behaviors of segment linings in an anisotropically jointed rock mass[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(10): 1773-1781. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201810003

Experimental study on behaviors of segment linings in an anisotropically jointed rock mass

More Information
  • Received Date: May 15, 2017
  • Published Date: October 24, 2018
  • As the structural strength in the deep layered rock is of anisotropic characteristics, the segment lining is susceptible to unsymmetrical pressure when the shield tunnel is constructed in such formations. Similar model tests are carried out to study the interaction between layered surrounding rock and shield segment lining, and the pressures on the surrounding rock behind the segment lining, internal forces and deformations of the segment lining are investigated. The research results indicate that the stress and deformation characteristics of the segment lining are obviously controlled by bedding plane, the segment lining is pressed very unevenly, and the axial forces, bending moments and deformations exhibit asymmetrical distribution. The maximum pressures on the surrounding rock behind the segment lining are concentrated in the normal direction of the weakest plane, and in this direction, the bending moments of the segment lining are the largest, the axial forces are the smallest and the deformations are the largest. The bedding angle has significant influence on the stress and deformation of the segment lining as well as the distribution and size of pressures on the surrounding rock. In the homogeneous surrounding rock, the fractures of the segment lining are mainly located at the joints of the key segment and other annular joints, while in the layered surrounding rock, the location of fractures of the segment lining is weakened by the influence of the position of joints, and the influence of the bedding dip is obvious. The location of fractures of the segment lining is mainly concentrated in the normal direction of the weakest plane. The results of this study have certain reference value for the design of the supporting structure type of shield tunnels in layered surrounding rock.
  • [1]
    彭焱森. 陡倾层状岩体隧道开挖稳定性研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2012.
    (PENG Yan-sen.Study on the stabilization of excavating the steep-dipping rock mass Tunnel[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2012. (in Chinese))
    [2]
    刘恺德, 刘泉声, 朱元广, 等. 考虑层理方向效应煤岩巴西劈裂及单轴压缩试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(2): 308-316.
    (LIU Kai-de, LIU Quan-sheng, ZHU Yuan-guang, et al.Experimental study of coal considering directivity effect of bedding plane under brazilian splitting and uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(2): 308-316. (in Chinese))
    [3]
    朱永全, 李文江, 赵勇. 软弱围岩隧道稳定性变形控制技术[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2012.
    (ZHU Yong-quan, LI Wen-jiang, ZHAO Yong.Deformation control technology of weak surrounding rock tunnel stability[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    RAMAMURTHY T, VENKATAPPA G R, SINGH J.Engineering behavior of phyllite[J]. Eng Geol, 1993, 169: 80-90.
    [5]
    CHO J W, KIM H, JEON S, et al.Deformation and strength anisotropy of Asan gneiss, Boryeongshale, and Yeoncheon schist[J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2012, 50: 158-169.
    [6]
    KARAKUL H, ULUSAY R, ISIK N S.Empirical models and numerical analysis for assessing strength anisotropy based on block punch index and uniaxial compression tests[J]. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 2010, 47: 657-665.
    [7]
    侯鹏, 高峰, 杨玉贵, 等. 考虑层理影响页岩巴西劈裂及声发射试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(6): 1603-1612.
    (HOU Peng, GAO Feng, YANG Yu-gui, et al.Effect of bedding plane direction on acoustic emission characteristics of shale in Brazilian tests[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(6): 1603-1612. (in Chinese))
    [8]
    沙鹏, 伍法权, 李响, 等. 高地应力条件下层状地层隧道围岩挤压变形与支护受力特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(5): 1407-1414.
    (SA Peng, WU Fa-quan, LI Xiang, et al.Squeezing deformation in layered surrounding rock and force characteristics of support system of a tunnel under high in-situ stress[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(5): 1407-1414. (in Chinese))
    [9]
    夏彬伟. 深埋隧道层状岩体破坏失稳机理实验研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2009.
    (XIA Bin-wei.Experimental study on the mechanism of instability of layered rock mass in deep tunnel[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2009. (in Chinese))
    [10]
    李晓红, 夏彬伟, 李丹, 等. 深埋隧道层状围岩变形特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(4): 1163-1167.
    (LI Xiao-hong, XIA Bin-wei, LI Dan, et al.Deformation characteristics analysis of layered rockmass in deep buried tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(4): 1163-1167. (in Chinese))
    [11]
    李树忱, 马腾飞, 蒋宇静. 深部多裂隙岩体开挖变形破坏规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(6): 987-995.
    (LI Shu-chen, MA Teng-fei, JIANG Yu-jing, et al.Model tests on deformation and failure laws in excavation of deep rock mass with multiple fracture sets[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(6): 987-995. (in Chinese))
    [12]
    杨松林, 朱焕春, 刘祖德. 加锚层状岩体的本构模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2001, 23(4): 427-430.
    (YANG Song-lin, ZHU Huan-chun, LIU Zu-de.A new constitutive model of the layered rock mass reinforced with bolts[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23(4): 427-430. (in Chinese))
    [13]
    马腾飞, 李树忱, 李术才, 等. 考不同倾角多层节理深部岩体开挖变形破坏规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(10): 2899-2908.
    (MA Teng-fei, LI Shu-chen, LI Shu-cai, et al.Model experimental study of deformation and failure law in excavation of deep rock mass with multi-cleftiness of different angles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(10): 2899-2908. (in Chinese))
    [14]
    BOSSART P, WERMEILLE S.The stress field in the Mont Terri region-data compilation[M]. Bern: Swiss Geological Survey, 2003: 65-92.
    [15]
    BLÜMLING P, BERNIER F, LEBON P, et al. The excavation damaged zone in clay formations time-dependent behaviour and influence on performance assessment[J]. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C, 2007, 32: 588-599.
    [16]
    FORTSAKIS P, NIKAS K, MARINOS V, et al.Anisotropic behaviour of stratified rock masses in tunnelling[J]. Engineering Geology, 2012(141/142): 74-83.
    [17]
    SAGONG M, PARK D, YOO J, et al.Experimental and numerical analyses of an opening in a jointed rock mass under biaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(7): 1055-1067.
    [18]
    地盘工学会.シールドトンネルの新技術[M]. 东京: 鹿岛出版社, 1997.
    (Research Association on New Shield Tunnology. New technology in shield tunneling[M]. Tokyo: Kajima Institute Publishity Co. Ltd. 1997. (in Japanese))
    [19]
    王士民, 于清洋, 彭博, 等. 封顶块位置对盾构隧道管片结构力学特征与破坏形态的影响分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(6): 123-132.
    (WANG Shi-min, YU Qing-yang, PENG Bo, et al.Analysis of mechanical characteristics and failure pattern of shield tunnel segment with different position of key block[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49(6): 123-132. (in Chinese))
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 陈志敏,赵吉万,龚军,陈宇飞,李增印,孙胜旗. 极高地应力软岩隧道非对称变形机理及支护优化研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2024(01): 109-119 .
    2. 李元海,赵万勇,朱茂国,刘德柱,于恒. 软弱缓倾层状岩层隧道围岩结构变形与失稳机制试验研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2024(06): 1148-1157 .
    3. 唐彬,孙长红,程桦,王要平,曹伟,张大欢,黄志鸿,刘子默,唐永志,王传兵. TBM掘进煤矿巷道装配式支护结构足尺试验. 工程科学与技术. 2023(02): 242-251 .
    4. 李军,王永刚,郑军,尉敏,马晓博,高鑫. 泥岩节理对泥砂岩互层隧道初期支护结构受力变形的影响. 公路. 2023(11): 357-363 .
    5. 黄敏,牛庆伟,付庭茂,黄河. 岩层倾角对片岩隧道变形特征的影响. 山西建筑. 2022(01): 134-136 .
    6. 王亚琼,杨强,潘红伟,高启栋,张士朝,王志丰. 基于3DEC模拟的高地应力水平层状隧道围岩变形破坏特征分析. 现代隧道技术. 2022(04): 127-136+146 .
    7. 苟玉轩,黄强兵,杨晓强,王立新,石卫,杨兆. 大角度斜交地裂缝带盾构隧道变形破坏机制的模型试验研究. 土木工程学报. 2022(10): 117-130 .
    8. 赖孝辉,刘洋,周子扬,何川,杨文波,李永林,张文居. 层状千枚岩隧道地震动力响应不对称性研究. 公路. 2021(04): 339-348 .
    9. 徐海岩,王志杰,陈昌健,蔡李斌,李振,邓宇航,夏勇. 土砂互层隧道塌方及演变规律的模型试验研究. 岩土工程学报. 2021(06): 1050-1058 . 本站查看
    10. 窦玉梅. 输水隧洞白云岩洞段悬空区锚杆支护方案优化研究. 东北水利水电. 2020(07): 17-18+54 .

    Other cited types(21)

Catalog

    Article views (315) PDF downloads (256) Cited by(31)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return