• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
金问鲁. 论设计中的比较方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1988, 10(3): 1-12.
引用本文: 金问鲁. 论设计中的比较方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1988, 10(3): 1-12.
Jin Wenlu. On the Comparison Method in Design[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 10(3): 1-12.
Citation: Jin Wenlu. On the Comparison Method in Design[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 10(3): 1-12.

论设计中的比较方法

On the Comparison Method in Design

  • 摘要: 一些复杂结构,当缺少适当的计算方法,或基础资料不足,不能进行精确分析时,设计中的比较方法便成为一个重要课题。土力学地基问题存在不定因素尤多,地区性强,需要依赖丰富经验进行判断。其中粉砂震动液化问题特别复杂,当前国内外都仅能按统计法则给出经验公式。其间很难找出共同规律,这就给如何制订抗液化的合理措施带来困难。本文的比较方法就是为检验措施的安全系数而提出的。设计中采用比较方法将会带来巨大经济效益。

     

    Abstract: For some complex structural problems a rigorous analysis can not be obtained due to lack of appropriate computational method. In such case the comparison method will become very important. There are a lot of uncertain factors in the problems of soil mechanics and foundation,sometimes judgement must be made by aid of regional experience. Problems of liquefaction of silty sand are especially complex. In current methods empirical formulas based on statistics are used, it is hard to find the common rules among the different formulas, thus there are some difficulties in making a reasonable design. By the comparison method suggested in this paper, the safety factors of the design may be calculated. It is -worth-while to note that by adopting comparison method for design, large economical effect can be obtained.

     

/

返回文章
返回