• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
王伟堂. 石灰桩加固软弱地基试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1987, 9(1): 72-83.
引用本文: 王伟堂. 石灰桩加固软弱地基试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1987, 9(1): 72-83.
Wang Weitang. Experimental Study on Quicklime Pile for Stabilizing Soft Foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987, 9(1): 72-83.
Citation: Wang Weitang. Experimental Study on Quicklime Pile for Stabilizing Soft Foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987, 9(1): 72-83.

石灰桩加固软弱地基试验研究

Experimental Study on Quicklime Pile for Stabilizing Soft Foundation

  • 摘要: 自1982年以来,我们在杭州市深厚软土地区的三个场地进行了石灰桩加固软弱地基的试验研究。 11台底板尺寸为2×2m的载荷板试验和静力触探、十字板及钻孔取土等室内外试验结果证明,石灰桩对加固杂填土和软粘土地基均有明显效果。石灰桩可使淤泥质土的含水量和孔隙比明显降低,并使淤泥质粘土的十字板抗剪强度cu提高到原来的1.13~4.50倍;对杂填土地基其加固效果更加显著(载荷试验表明,地基容许承载力可提高到原来的1.58~4.14倍)。 石灰桩已首次在上述地区的三幢六层住宅工程中应用。孔隙水压力、压力盒、磁性分层沉降仪和长期沉降观测表明,建筑物沉降均匀、工作性能良好。 本文还根据八项典型工程的调查,给出了杭州深厚软土地区住宅地基常用处埋方法的技术经济分析结果。对比分析表明,在相同地质条件下,采用石灰桩可比钢筋混凝土预制桩和混凝土灌注桩节约基础费用40~60%左右。

     

    Abstract: Since 1982, the author has innovated the use of quicklime piles to stabilize soft clay foundations of three housing projects in HangzhouIt has been proved that the quicklime pile is really an effective means for stabilizing soft foundation by eleven 2m×2m field plate bearing tests with collaborated vane tests and laboratory tests. The water content and void ratio of soft mucky clay could be considerably reduced and the vane shear strength was increased 1.13-4.50 times after treatment. The plate bearing tests demonstrated that the allowable bearing capacities of miscellaneous fills were increased 1.58-4.14 times after treatment.The quicklime pile has been used for the first time in three six-storey housing projects in Hangzhou. According to the weasuring results of pore-water pressures, contact pressures under the foundations and settlements of buildings it was proved that the buildings settled uniformly and performed well.The technical and economical results of the stabilization methods of house foundations commonly used in Hangzhou are also presented in this paper. The economical analysis indicated that the cost cost could be reduced by an amount of 40%-60% if quicklime piles were used instead of precast concrete piles or cast-inplace concrete piles under the same geological conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回