• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
唐红梅, 鲜学福, 王林峰, 陈洪凯. 基于小波变换的碎石土垫层落石冲击回弹系数试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(7): 1278-1282.
引用本文: 唐红梅, 鲜学福, 王林峰, 陈洪凯. 基于小波变换的碎石土垫层落石冲击回弹系数试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(7): 1278-1282.
TANG Hong-mei, XIAN Xue-fu, WANG Lin-feng, Chen Hong-kai. Coefficient of resilience for rock fall onto gravel soil cushion based on wavelet transform theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(7): 1278-1282.
Citation: TANG Hong-mei, XIAN Xue-fu, WANG Lin-feng, Chen Hong-kai. Coefficient of resilience for rock fall onto gravel soil cushion based on wavelet transform theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(7): 1278-1282.

基于小波变换的碎石土垫层落石冲击回弹系数试验

Coefficient of resilience for rock fall onto gravel soil cushion based on wavelet transform theory

  • 摘要: 针对碎石土体,通过模型试验设计:选取下垫面土体为4种土石比的12种密实度、5种落实高度,采用动态应变仪获取的落石冲击力波,经小波消噪处理,提取出最大冲击力;试验获取相应的变形模量和泊松比。根据Hertz碰撞理论,通过冲击过程能量转化的分析,用回弹系数考虑冲击过程中的能量损失,建立了落石最大冲击力公式。在试验的基础上,通过试验值反算各种土石比在不同密实度下回弹系数的均值和最大值。结果表明:回弹系数随垫层密实度的增加而增大;土石比为4∶6的碎石土垫层的回弹系数高于其它3种土石比垫层,在其密实的状况下极大值可达0.314;而土石比为3∶7的碎石土垫层的回弹系数最小,在其疏松状况下极大值为0.266。所获的细化的碎石土垫层回弹系数与已有的结论趋于一致,能较好地为落石运动路径计算和防治工程设计提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract: The inversion of the coefficient of resillience is an important method based on the experimental data. The model experiments are designed as follows: 12 kinds of density and 5 kinds of height of rock fall based on 4 kinds of soil-rock ratio cushion of gravel soils. The impact waves are gained by use of the dynamic strain gauge. Using the wavelet theory, the maximum impact force is extracted. Based on the hertz collision theory and the conversion of engery, and by using the coefficient of resilience to consider the lose of engery in the course of lashing, an formula for the impact force of rock fall is established. The deformation modulus and the Poisson's ratio of gravel soils are gained through experiments. The coefficient of resillience is gained using the inversion analysis based on model data. The results show that: (1) the coefficient of resillience increases with the increase of dry desnity of cushion; (2) the coefficient of resilience of the cushion with compactnesses of 4:6 is the largest among 4 kinds of cushions, with the maximum value being 0.314 and that of the cushion with compactnesses of 3:7 is the smallest, with the minimum value being 0.266. Compared with the former relative studies, the results are basically consistent. This study provides a scientific basis for the motion trajectory of rock fall and the relevant measures.

     

/

返回文章
返回