• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
胡昕, 张希宏, 刘厚健, 刘志伟. 桩基中性点深度估算方法对比分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(sup2): 184-187.
引用本文: 胡昕, 张希宏, 刘厚健, 刘志伟. 桩基中性点深度估算方法对比分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(sup2): 184-187.
HU Xin, ZHANG Xi-hong, LIU Hou-jian, LIU Zhi-wei. Comparison and analysis of estimation methods for depth of neutral point of pile foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(sup2): 184-187.
Citation: HU Xin, ZHANG Xi-hong, LIU Hou-jian, LIU Zhi-wei. Comparison and analysis of estimation methods for depth of neutral point of pile foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(sup2): 184-187.

桩基中性点深度估算方法对比分析

Comparison and analysis of estimation methods for depth of neutral point of pile foundation

  • 摘要: 通过对现有桩基中性点估算方法的总结分析,探讨了它们各自的特点及其适用范围,并结合工程实例对实测值和估算值进行了比较,对各种估算方法进行了评价。研究表明:经验取值法最为简便易行,但估算结果偏大;渐次趋近法适用范围最广,但估算过程较为繁琐,估算结果准确度较差;日本规范法和理论近似解法涉及参数较多,但估算结果较为贴近实际。

     

    Abstract: By analyzing of the existing methods for the neutral point of piling foundation, their features and applications are studied. The measured and predicted values are compared, and the various means are evaluated with engineering illustrations. The results indicate that the method of empirical value is the simplest and easiest one, but its predicted value is large. The gradually approaching method can be used under most conditions, but its forecasting process is complicated. The Japanese standard method and the theoretical approximation method involve more parameters, but their predicted values are more close to the measured ones.

     

/

返回文章
返回