• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
许江波, 冯夏庭, 郑颖人, 赵尚毅, 叶海林. 有限元与极限分析法计算桩后推力的分析与比较[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 28(9).
引用本文: 许江波, 冯夏庭, 郑颖人, 赵尚毅, 叶海林. 有限元与极限分析法计算桩后推力的分析与比较[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 28(9).
Comparison and analysis of landslide thrust by use of finite element and limit analysis methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 28(9).
Citation: Comparison and analysis of landslide thrust by use of finite element and limit analysis methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 28(9).

有限元与极限分析法计算桩后推力的分析与比较

Comparison and analysis of landslide thrust by use of finite element and limit analysis methods

  • 摘要: 极限分析法是常用的计算桩后推力的方法,但计算中无法考虑桩的变形因素,这种方法假定桩后岩土体变形不受限制,抗滑力充分发挥,计算出的推力是主动土压力。当桩变形受限制而使抗滑力不能充分发挥时,计算结果与实际有偏差。有限元用于计算桩后推力时,遵循桩–土共同作用的原则,它不是极限分析法,算出的推力依据桩的变形,可能是主动土压力,也可能不是主动土压力,此外还可以得到相应的推力分布。当滑坡设计安全系数较小时,岩土体抗滑强度未得到充分发挥,有限元与极限分析法有一定差距;随着设计安全系数的增大,岩土体逐渐达到极限情况,有限元与极限分析法算出的推力趋于一致。依据经验,在一般桩设计安全系数下,两者计算得出推力一致,表明有限元用于计算桩后推力是可行的。本文对影响有限元计算推力的几种因素进行了分析,并与极限分析法(不平衡推力法、Spencer法)进行了比较,说明了两种方法何种情况下计算结果一致,何种情况下不一致。

     

    Abstract: The traditional limit analysis method is commonly used to calculate pile thrust, but it can not take the pile deformation into account. This method assumes that the deformation is unrestricted, the sliding force can be put into full play, and the calculated thrust is active stress. When the pile deformation is restricted and the stabilizing force can not be fully exerted, the calculated results are inaccurate. When the finite element method is used to calculate the pile thrust, it conforms to the pile-soil interaction principles and it is not the limit analysis method. The result based on the pile deformation may be active stress and the corresponding thrust distribution can also be obtained. When the pile design safety factor is small, the anti-slide strength of rock and soil is not fully exerted. The finite element method has some discrepancy with the traditional method. With the increase of discount factor, the rock and soil reaches the limit state gradually. The finite element method agrees with the traditional method. Based on the experience, the calculated thrusts by the two methods are the same under general design safety factor, indicating that the finite element method to calculate the pile thrust is feasible. Several factors for the finite element method to calculate the thrust are analyzed. A comparison between the proposed method and the traditional limit analysis method (unbalanced thrust law, Spencer method) shows that the calculated results are consistent or inconsistent under what cases.

     

/

返回文章
返回