• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
顾晓强, 周赫宸, 何平, 张中杰, 徐中华, 王卫东. 上海黏性土水平基床比例系数m的反演取值及工程验证[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240012
引用本文: 顾晓强, 周赫宸, 何平, 张中杰, 徐中华, 王卫东. 上海黏性土水平基床比例系数m的反演取值及工程验证[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240012
Study on the proportional coefficient m of horizontal subgrade reaction for Shanghai clayey soils and engineering verification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240012
Citation: Study on the proportional coefficient m of horizontal subgrade reaction for Shanghai clayey soils and engineering verification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240012

上海黏性土水平基床比例系数m的反演取值及工程验证

Study on the proportional coefficient m of horizontal subgrade reaction for Shanghai clayey soils and engineering verification

  • 摘要: 水平基床比例系数m是弹性地基梁法计算基坑变形的最关键参数,然而既有规范提供的m取值范围大,且尚未合理反映土体力学特性和基坑尺寸的影响。本文讨论了现有不同规范中m值规定的差异和不足,指出比例系数m本质上是一个简化的工程土体变形计算参数。对于基坑工程,m应当与土性参数、基坑开挖深度及宽度等相关。基于土体小应变硬化模型及合理的参数取值方法,通过数值计算获取了大量基坑算例的变形数据,再通过反分析建立了一套考虑土体参数(初始孔隙比)、基坑开挖深度及宽度的上海黏性土m值的实用取值方法。基于该取值方法,采用弹性地基梁法计算了上海地区25个实际基坑工程围护结构的变形。结果表明,基坑围护墙最大水平位移的计算值与实测值较为接近,平均误差为2.6%。本文方法解决了上海地区实际基坑工程中黏性土m值如何准确且快速取值的难题,也为其他地区建立类似取值方法提供了有益的借鉴。

     

    Abstract: The proportional coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction m is a key parameter to calculate the deformation of retaining wall in excavations using beam on vertical elastic subgrade method. However, the range of m value recommended in design code is quite large and does not yet consider the effects of soil property and excavation dimension. In this study, the differences and deficiencies of the m value in different engineering codes are firstly discussed, pointing out that actually m is a simplified parameter for deformation calculation in the engineering. For excavation, m should be related to soil properties, excavation width and depth. By numerical analyses with hardening soil model with small strain and appropriate soil parameters, lots of excavation deformation data are obtained by changing excavation dimensions and void ratio of soils. Then inversion calculation was performed to determine the m value based on the deformation data and an empirical formula for determining m is proposed. With this method, the m values of the soils in 25 excavation projects in Shanghai are determined and the associated deformations are calculated using beam on elastic subgrade method. The results show that the calculated maximum horizontal displacements of retaining wall are close to the measured ones, with an average error of 2.6%. This proposed method provides an accurate and efficient approach to determine the m value for Shanghai clayey soils as well as an important reference for determining the m value of soils in other regions.

     

/

返回文章
返回