• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
侯本伟, 刘嘉伟, 张亚波, 韩俊艳, 钟紫蓝, 杜修力. 典型交叉连接形式的承插式埋地管线地震响应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231079
引用本文: 侯本伟, 刘嘉伟, 张亚波, 韩俊艳, 钟紫蓝, 杜修力. 典型交叉连接形式的承插式埋地管线地震响应分析[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231079
Seismic Response Characteristics of Buried Segment Pipeline with Typical Cross-connections[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231079
Citation: Seismic Response Characteristics of Buried Segment Pipeline with Typical Cross-connections[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231079

典型交叉连接形式的承插式埋地管线地震响应分析

Seismic Response Characteristics of Buried Segment Pipeline with Typical Cross-connections

  • 摘要: 埋地管线的接口类型以及管线交叉连接形式,对管线结构地震响应造成较大影响。由于管线交叉处的受力和变形特征受到各分肢管线结构类型的影响,本文首先建立分肢直线型管线有限元模型,分析了地震波作用下柔性接口球墨铸铁管线(DIP)和刚性接口灰口铸铁管线(CIP)的接口张开量、接口轴力、管土相对变位以及管体受力特征;然后分析了采用十字型、T型、L型和双T型交叉管件连接的管线地震响应特征,其中交叉管件与各分肢管线分别采用承插式和法兰式两种连接口,并比较了接口类型对各类交叉管件地震响应的影响规律。结果表明:对于地震波作用下不同接口类型的直线型管线,DIP柔性接口峰值张开量大于CIP刚性接口,CIP刚性接口管线轴力远大于DIP柔性接口管线。管线交叉处采用承插式接口时,双T型交叉管件连接的管线接口峰值张开量略小于十字型、T型连接。管线交叉处采用法兰接口时,与法兰口邻接的DIP柔性接口张开量较大、易发生拉伸破坏,与法兰口邻接的CIP刚性接口轴向压力较大、易发生受压破坏;在双T型交叉处,与法兰口邻接的承插接口响应显著大于十字型、T型连接。

     

    Abstract: The joint type and pipeline cross connection of buried pipelines have a significant impact on the seismic response of pipeline structures. As the seismic deformation and stress of pipeline cross is determined by the structure types of branch pipelines, a finite element model of straight branch pipelines was firstly established to investigate the joint displacement, joint axial force, pipe-soil relative displacement, and pipe body stress of ductile iron pipelines (DIP) with flexible push-on rubber joints and cast iron pipelines (CIP) with rigid joint under seismic wave propagation. Then, the seismic response of pipeline connections using cross-shaped, T-shaped, L-shaped, and double-T-shaped cross connections were analyzed, where the pipe cross was connected to branch pipelines using push-on or flange joint. Furthermore, the effects of joint types on the seismic response of pipeline cross connections are evaluated. The results show that for the straight pipelines with different types of joints, the peak joint displacement of DIP with flexible joint is larger than that of CIP with rigid joint. When the pipe cross was connected with push-on joint, the peak joint displacement of the pipeline with double-T-shaped cross is slightly smaller than that of the pipelines with cross-shaped and T-shaped connections. When the pipe cross was connected using flange joints, the DIP with flexible joints adjacent to the flange joints exhibits a larger joint displacement and is prone to tensile failure, while the CIP with rigid joint adjacent to the flange joint experiences greater axial compressive force and is prone to compressive failure. At the cross of double-T-shaped pipelines, the response of the push-on joint adjacent to the flange joint is significantly larger than that of cross-shaped and T-shaped connections.

     

/

返回文章
返回