• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
涂兵雄, 魏健, 贾金青, 俞缙, 李志伟, 蔡奇鹏. 新型拉压复合型锚杆荷载传递机理的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231016
引用本文: 涂兵雄, 魏健, 贾金青, 俞缙, 李志伟, 蔡奇鹏. 新型拉压复合型锚杆荷载传递机理的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231016
Numerical Simulation Study on Load Transfer Mechanism of New TC-Anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231016
Citation: Numerical Simulation Study on Load Transfer Mechanism of New TC-Anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20231016

新型拉压复合型锚杆荷载传递机理的数值模拟研究

Numerical Simulation Study on Load Transfer Mechanism of New TC-Anchor

  • 摘要: 新型拉压复合型锚杆具有良好的锚固性能,在抗浮工程中优势明显并逐渐推广应用,但其荷载传递规律尚不明晰。基于此,针对现场试验,采用有限差分法对拉压复合型锚杆的荷载传递规律开展研究,初步分析了筋体轴向拉力、灌浆体轴向应力、浆土界面剪应力分布规律,进而探究了承压锚固段与受拉锚固段协同承载规律。结果表明,拉压复合型锚杆筋体轴向拉力在承压锚固段保持不变,拉力传递至受拉锚固段后大幅降低。灌浆体轴向应力在截面沿径向分布相对均匀,并随荷载增大而增加;灌浆体在承压锚固段受压,压应力向端头递减,最大轴向压应力显著低于压力型锚杆;灌浆体在受拉锚固段受拉,拉应力在中间大,并向两侧减小,最大拉应力显著低于拉力型锚杆;优化拉压长度比,可以进一步减小受拉锚固段灌浆体受到的轴向拉应力。拉压复合型锚杆浆土界面剪应力在承载体处最大,向两侧减小;与拉力型和压力型锚杆相比,相同拉力下,拉压复合型锚杆浆土界面剪应力显著减小,应力集中现象明显削弱,且分布更加均匀。拉压复合型锚杆破坏时受拉承载系数略低于受拉长度系数,承压锚固段与受拉锚固段协同破坏时的极限抗拔承载力高于非协同破坏。

     

    Abstract: The new TC-anchor has excellent anchoring performance and has obvious advantages in anti-floating engineering, gradually gaining widespread application. However, the load transfer mechanism of this type of anchor is not yet clearly understood. In light of this, a study on the load transfer mechanism of TC-anchor was conducted based on field experiments using the finite difference method. The study provided a preliminary analysis of the distribution patterns of axial tension in the rebar, axial stress in the grouting material, and shear stress at the grout-soil interface. Furthermore, the collaborative load-bearing behavior between the compression anchorage segment and the tension anchorage segment was explored. The results indicate that the axial tension in the rebar of the TC-anchor remains constant in the compression anchorage segment but significantly decreases after transferring to the tension anchorage segment. The axial stress in the grouting material is relatively uniform along the cross-section and increases with the applied load. In the compression anchorage segment, the grouting material experiences compression, with the compressive stress decreasing towards the head, and the maximum axial compressive stress significantly lower than that of a pressure-type anchor. In the tension anchorage segment, the grouting material experiences tension, with the maximum tensile stress occurring in the middle and decreasing towards both sides, significantly lower than that of a tension-type anchor. Optimizing the tension-compression length ratio can further reduce the axial tensile stress in the grouting material of the tension anchorage segment. The shear stress at the grout-soil interface of the TC-anchor is highest at the load-bearing body and decreases towards both sides. Compared to tension-type and pressure-type anchor under the same tension, the TC-anchor exhibits significantly reduced shear stress at the grout-soil interface, weakened stress concentration, and a more uniform distribution. During failure, the tension bearing coefficient of the TC-anchor is slightly lower than the tension length coefficient. The ultimate pull-out capacity during collaborative failure of the compression anchorage segment and the tension anchorage segment is higher than that of non-collaborative failure.

     

/

返回文章
返回