• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
吴楷, 陈仁朋, 孟凡衍, 胡博. 竖向卸荷下砂土和粉质黏土力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230850
引用本文: 吴楷, 陈仁朋, 孟凡衍, 胡博. 竖向卸荷下砂土和粉质黏土力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230850
Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of sand and silty clay under vertical unloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230850
Citation: Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of sand and silty clay under vertical unloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230850

竖向卸荷下砂土和粉质黏土力学特性试验研究

Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of sand and silty clay under vertical unloading

  • 摘要: 土体极限卸荷比和临界卸荷比是确定基坑底扰动区深度的重要指标。基于福建标准砂和福州粉质黏土开展了多组竖向卸荷试验,根据归一化回弹变形确定了土体卸荷比特征值。试验结果表明:竖向卸荷下土体表现出三阶段回弹变形规律;小于临界卸荷比时,土体回弹变形可忽略不计;而大于极限卸荷比时,土体回弹变形、侧压力系数快速增加,回弹模量和剪切模量显著弱化,水平残余应力比出现拐点且开始下降。总结了既有卸荷试验中黏性土、粉土和砂土等土体的卸荷比特征值,分析了既有研究的试验手段和卸荷比特征值的判断依据,并对比了不同土体试验结果。

     

    Abstract: Ultimate unloading ratio and critical unloading ratio are crucial parameters for determining the depth of disturbance below excavation base. The vertical unloading tests were performed on Fujian sand and Fuzhou silty clay, with characteristic unloading ratios determined based on normalized resilience value. Results indicate that the soil's unloading response changes in three phases. When the loading ratio is less than the critical unloading ratio, the soil's response can be ignored. Meanwhile, as the loading ratio exceeds the ultimate unloading ratio, the soil's normalized resilience value and lateral pressure coefficient increase rapidly, and the resilience modulus and shear modulus weaken significantly. Additionally, at this point, the horizontal residual stress ratio displays an inflection point and begins to decline. Furthermore, the characteristic unloading ratios of clay, silt and sand in unloading tests are summarized. The experimental methods and the judgment criteria of characteristic unloading ratios are analyzed in this paper, while the test results from different soil layers are compared.

     

/

返回文章
返回