• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
余志祥, 骆泓锦, 张丽君, 骆丽茹, 金云涛, 赵雷. 考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517
引用本文: 余志祥, 骆泓锦, 张丽君, 骆丽茹, 金云涛, 赵雷. 考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517
Coupling analysis method for flexible debris flow barriers considering water blocking and permeability effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517
Citation: Coupling analysis method for flexible debris flow barriers considering water blocking and permeability effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517

考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析方法

Coupling analysis method for flexible debris flow barriers considering water blocking and permeability effects

  • 摘要: 针对柔性防护网在粘性泥石流通过时的透水效应问题,本文在柔性环连网等效薄膜有限单元(FEM)的基础上,结合S-ALE和Ergun公式的欧拉-拉格朗日耦合算法,提出了Structured-ALE-FEM耦合算法(后文简称S-A-F方法),实现了考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析。结合USGS的泥石流柔性防护模型试验,开展了泥石流柔性防护全过程动力学分析,并与试验结果进行了对比分析。研究表明:本文提出的耦合方法可再现泥石流冲击、爬高及渗透堆积的全过程;与试验相比,泥石流堆积高度和堆积宽度的最大误差分别为11.9%和10.3%,泥石流浆体通过量最大差量为3.2%;柔性防护网关键部件动力响应与试验相比,右侧拉锚绳、左侧拉锚绳及网片最大变形量时程曲线误差分别为3.2%、16.4%及14.4%。与不考虑阻水效应的两种理论算法相比,S-A-F方法在泥石流冲击力峰值和泥石流浆体通过量准确度较同类其他方法提升了4.69%和17.50%。论文提出的S-A-F耦合方法可用于粘性泥石流柔性防护工程的设计计算。

     

    Abstract: To solve the dynamic effect of blocking and permeate water under the scouring effect of mudflow on flexible protection project. In this paper, a coupled S-ALE-FEM calculation method considering the water blocking and permeability effect of mudflow flexible protection process is established. The equivalent thin film unit of the ring network considering the water-blocking-permeability effect is established, according to which the Euler-Lagrange coupling algorithm based on S-ALE and Ergun formula is proposed to realize the equivalent water-blocking-permeability quantification calculation of the dense curved beam-like metal ring network mudslide protection process. The kinetic analysis of the whole process of mudflow flexible protection is carried out in conjunction with the USGS mudflow flexible protection model tests, the results are compared with the test results. The study shows that: the coupled method proposed in the paper can reproduce the full process inversion of debris flow impact, height climbing and infiltration accumulation; compared with the test, the maximum errors of debris flow accumulation height and accumulation width are 11.9% and 10.3%, respectively, and the maximum difference of debris flow slurry passage is 3.2%; compared with the test, the dynamic response of key components of the flexible protection system, the maximum errors of right side anchor rope, left side anchor rope and mesh Compared with the test, the errors of the time course curves of the key components of the flexible protection system are 3.2%, 16.4% and 14.4% respectively. Compared with the two theoretical algorithms that do not consider the water blocking effect, the accuracy of the calculation results of the peak debris flow impact force and the difference of debris flow slurry passage are improved by 4.69% and 17.50% at maximum. The S-A-F coupling method proposed in the paper solves the design and calculation challenges of mudflow flexible protection engineering.

     

/

返回文章
返回