• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
高启栋, 张宸, 范勇, 周海孝, 卢文波, 冷振东. 坝基缓坡预裂开挖中不同布孔方式下的爆破扰动比较分析[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230110
引用本文: 高启栋, 张宸, 范勇, 周海孝, 卢文波, 冷振东. 坝基缓坡预裂开挖中不同布孔方式下的爆破扰动比较分析[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230110
Comparation and analysis of blasting disturbance under different hole arrangement in presplitting excavation of dam foundation gentle slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230110
Citation: Comparation and analysis of blasting disturbance under different hole arrangement in presplitting excavation of dam foundation gentle slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230110

坝基缓坡预裂开挖中不同布孔方式下的爆破扰动比较分析

Comparation and analysis of blasting disturbance under different hole arrangement in presplitting excavation of dam foundation gentle slope

  • 摘要: 在坝基缓坡预裂开挖中,为解决传统主爆孔或缓冲孔顺坡布设时(称之为顺坡布孔)钻孔效率低的问题,工程建设者尝试采用了反坡钻孔的方式(称之为反坡布孔),有必要对两种布孔方式下坝基保留岩体扰动情况进行比较分析,以指导工程实践。依托白鹤滩水电站坝基缓坡开挖,分别开展了顺坡布孔与反坡布孔两种开挖方式下的现场爆破试验,同时借助LS-DYNA三维动力有限元模拟,比较分析了两种布孔方式下保留岩体的爆破损伤演化特性与振动分布规律,并揭示了不同布孔方式下的内在力学作用机制,最后综合考虑开挖成型效果与施工速率,对坝基缓坡开挖方案的选择进行了探讨。结果表明:两种布孔方式下由预裂孔引起的保留岩体扰动情况基本一致,区别在于主爆孔或缓冲孔引起的累积损伤效应与爆破振动,内在原因在于炮孔与保留岩体轮廓面夹角的变化。相对顺坡布孔,反坡布孔因增大了主爆孔或缓冲孔与轮廓面的夹角,减少了传输至保留岩体的爆炸能量,有利于减轻对保留岩体的扰动,可减小损伤深度约11.6%~13.9%,降低爆破振动约6.4%~53.7%。

     

    Abstract: In the presplitting blasting excavation of dam foundation gentle slope, to solve the problem of low drilling efficiency when the production blast-holes or buffering blast-holes are traditionally arranged along the slope (blast-holes along the slope, BHAS), the engineers try to adopt the way of reverse slope drilling (blast-holes reverse the slope, BHRS). However, the dynamic responses of rock mass under different ways of blast-hole arrangements are different. So, it is necessary to compare the disturbance of the reserved rock mass in dam foundation under the two aforementioned ways of blasthole arrangements. Based on the gentle slope excavation of the dam foundation of Baihetan Hydropower Station, onsite blasting experiments were carried out under the two ways of blasthole arrangements, namely BHAS and BHRS. At the same time, the blast-induced damage evolution characteristics and vibration distribution law were analyzed under the above two ways of blasthole arrangements, by using the 3D dynamic finite element numerical simulation software (LS-DYNA). Moreover, the inherent mechanical mechanism under different ways of blasthole arrangements was revealed. Finally, the choice of the excavation scheme for the gentle slope of dam foundation was discussed from the views of the forming effect and construction efficiency. The results indicate that the disturbance of the reserved rock mass induced by presplitting blast-holes is basically the same under different ways of blast-hole arrangements. Nevertheless, the cumulative damage effect and blast vibration caused by production blastholes and buffering blastholes are different. The inherent cause lies in the change of the intersection angle between the blast-hole and the reserved rock mass surface. Compared with the BHAS, the explosion energy transmitted to the reserved rock mass was reduced, as the BHRS increase the intersection angle between the production blastholes or buffering blastholes with the contour surface. Thus, the BHRS is beneficial to reduce the disturbance to the reserved rock mass, which can reduce the damage depth by 11.6%~13.9% and the vibration velocity by 6.4%~53.7%.

     

/

返回文章
返回