• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
朱兆荣, 赵守全, 秦欣, 吴红刚, 赵常要, 武小鹏. 探地雷达隧道衬砌空洞探测效果模型和现场实体试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(S1): 132-137. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1024
引用本文: 朱兆荣, 赵守全, 秦欣, 吴红刚, 赵常要, 武小鹏. 探地雷达隧道衬砌空洞探测效果模型和现场实体试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(S1): 132-137. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1024
ZHU Zhao-rong, ZHAO Shou-quan, QIN-Xin, WU Hong-gang, ZHAO Chang-yao, WU Xiao-peng. Model and field tests on detection effects of tunnel lining cavity by GPR[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 132-137. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1024
Citation: ZHU Zhao-rong, ZHAO Shou-quan, QIN-Xin, WU Hong-gang, ZHAO Chang-yao, WU Xiao-peng. Model and field tests on detection effects of tunnel lining cavity by GPR[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(S1): 132-137. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2022S1024

探地雷达隧道衬砌空洞探测效果模型和现场实体试验研究

Model and field tests on detection effects of tunnel lining cavity by GPR

  • 摘要: 隧道衬砌空洞是常见的一种隧道工程病害,对隧道的运营安全具有较大危害。采用模型试验和现场实体试验相结合的方法,对探地雷达在铁路隧道衬砌空洞探测中应用效果进行了系统研究。采用探地雷达分别对27个无钢筋倾斜空洞模型、无钢筋水平空洞模型、有钢筋水平空洞模型的空洞边缘、上界面及空洞范围进行了检测,并与模型中空洞的实际尺寸进行了对比分析。结果表明,无钢筋倾斜空洞模型雷达检测图像可辨识度高,空洞形态完整,空洞边缘、上界面结构边界较清晰,空洞范围准确,误差为-0.4~0.5 cm;无钢筋水平空洞模型空洞的起始点位置清晰准确可见,空洞上表面雷达图像界面清晰,误差为-0.4~1.3 cm,但空洞下表面只能定性说明空洞的大致深度范围;有钢筋水平空洞界面形态完整,结构边界较清晰。研究结果可为以后采用探地雷达开展隧道衬砌质量检测工作提供参考和借鉴。

     

    Abstract: The tunnel lining cavity is a common defect in tunnel engineering, which is harmful to the operation safety of the tunnel. The application effects of GPR in detection of railway tunnel lining cavity are studied through the combining model tests and field solid tests. The edges, upper interfaces and ranges of 27 unreinforced inclined cavity models, unreinforced horizontal cavity models and reinforced horizontal cavity models are detected by GPR, and compared with the actual sizes of the cavity in the model. The results show that the radar detection images of the unreinforced inclined cavity model have high discrimination, complete cavity shape, clear cavity edge and upper interface structure boundary, accurate cavity range and error of -0.4~0.5 cm. The starting point of the unreinforced horizontal cavity model is clearly and accurately visible, the radar image interface on the upper surface of the cavity is clear, and the error is -0.4~1.3 cm, but the lower surface of the cavity can only qualitatively explain the approximate depth range of the cavity. The horizontal cavity with reinforcement has complete interface shape and clear structural boundary. The research results may provide reference for the quality inspection of tunnel linings by GPR in the future.

     

/

返回文章
返回