• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
李承超, 关云飞, 蔡正银, 姜朋明, 韩迅. 基于严格滑移线场理论临坡条形基础地基极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(8): 1408-1416. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202108005
引用本文: 李承超, 关云飞, 蔡正银, 姜朋明, 韩迅. 基于严格滑移线场理论临坡条形基础地基极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(8): 1408-1416. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202108005
LI Cheng-chao, GUAN Yun-fei, CAI Zheng-yin, JIANG Peng-ming, HAN Xun. Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings placed near slopes determined by rigorous slip line field theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(8): 1408-1416. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202108005
Citation: LI Cheng-chao, GUAN Yun-fei, CAI Zheng-yin, JIANG Peng-ming, HAN Xun. Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings placed near slopes determined by rigorous slip line field theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(8): 1408-1416. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202108005

基于严格滑移线场理论临坡条形基础地基极限承载力分析

Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings placed near slopes determined by rigorous slip line field theory

  • 摘要: 临坡地基极限承载力的计算是岩土工程中的常见问题,欲求得其精确解,必须同时满足静力平衡条件和机动许可条件。基于严格滑移线场理论,利用特征线方程和三类基本边值问题构造同时满足应力边界条件和速度边界条件的滑移线场,并提出临坡地基5种单侧破坏模式,最终求得相应的地基极限承载力。利用上述方法,分析了土体剪切强度、边坡几何形状以及基础与坡肩相对位置对临坡地基极限承载力和破坏机理的影响。研究结果表明:计算结果与已有模型试验结果较为吻合。同时,临坡地基极限承载力随土体剪切强度的增大而增大,但随边坡高度和坡角的增大而减小。当边坡高度达到临界高度时,地基极限承载力不再随之发生变化。此外,极限承载力随基础与坡肩相对距离的增大而增大,并最终达到稳定。当基础放置位置达到临界值时,边坡稳定性对极限承载力不再产生影响,此时临坡地基整体结构服从Prandtl地基承载力破坏。随着基础与坡肩相对距离的增加,临坡地基的破坏模式由坡面承载力破坏,逐渐过渡到坡面滑动破坏或深部滑动破坏,并最终达到Prandtl地基承载力破坏,在此过程中临界滑动范围不断增大直至服从平地地基破坏模式,从而导致了极限承载力先增大后保持不变的过程。

     

    Abstract: Calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings placed near slopes has long been a critical component in geotechnical design. In order to obtain the accurate solution of this issue, the statically and kinematically admissible conditions should be satisfied beforehand. Based on the rigorous slip line field theory, the equations for characteristic line and the three kinds of basic boundary value problems are solved together to establish the slip line field of the footing-on-slope system that satisfies the stress and velocity boundaries simultaneously. Then, five types of unilateral failure modes are proposed to determine the corresponding ultimate bearing capacity. The effects of soil shear strength, slope geometry and setback distance from footing edge to slope on the ultimate bearing capacity and the failure mechanism are evaluated in this study. The results indicate that the proposed solutions show good agreement with the experimental results found in the literature. The parametric analysis presents that the ultimate bearing capacity increases with the shear strength, and decreases with an increase in the slope height and the slope angle. When the slope height reaches the critical value, the ultimate bearing capacity is no longer affected by the slope height. Meanwhile, the ultimate bearing capacity increases with the relative distance from footing edge to slope shoulder, and it finally remains unchanged. When the placement position of the footing reaches the critical value, the ultimate bearing capacity is no longer affected by the slope stability. At this point, the failure mechanism obeys the Prandtl’s bearing capacity failure. The failure mechanism gradually transits from the face bearing capacity failure to the face sliding failure or the deep sliding failure and finally follows the Prandtl’s bearing capacity failure with an increase in the relative distance. In this process, the critical sliding range gradually increases until the footing-on-slope system obeys the Prandtl’s failure mode, which results in the corresponding variation in the ultimate bearing capacity.

     

/

返回文章
返回