• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
唐春安, 陈峰, 孙晓明, 马天辉, 杜艳红. 恒阻锚杆支护机理数值分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(12): 2281-2288. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201812016
引用本文: 唐春安, 陈峰, 孙晓明, 马天辉, 杜艳红. 恒阻锚杆支护机理数值分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(12): 2281-2288. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201812016
TANG Chun-an, CHEN Feng, SUN Xiao-ming, MA Tian-hui, DU Yan-hong. Numerical analysis for support mechanism of constant-resistance bolts[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 2281-2288. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201812016
Citation: TANG Chun-an, CHEN Feng, SUN Xiao-ming, MA Tian-hui, DU Yan-hong. Numerical analysis for support mechanism of constant-resistance bolts[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 2281-2288. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201812016

恒阻锚杆支护机理数值分析

Numerical analysis for support mechanism of constant-resistance bolts

  • 摘要: 为了研究恒阻锚杆的拉伸力学性能,采用RFPA软件对恒阻锚杆进行拉伸数值试验,试验结果表明,恒阻锚杆拉伸断裂后塑性应变最大值是弹性应变最大值的12倍,并且在塑性变形过程中应力值在28.01~38.71 MPa范围内波动,且波动较为稳定,数值试验结果与何满潮院士室内试验结果吻合度较高,验证了数值试验方法的准确性和可靠性。以此为依据,进一步采用数值试验方法研究荷载作用下恒阻锚杆和围岩相互作用原理,分析锚固岩体的受力特征和变形破坏特征,并对比分析传统锚杆和恒阻锚杆的支护效果,通过对比分析可知,恒阻锚杆的支护效果优于传统锚杆,为易发生大变形破坏的软岩及冲击地压控制提供了有效途径。

     

    Abstract: In order to study the tensile mechanical properties of constant-resistance bolts, the numerical simulation of the tensile strength of a constant-resistance bolt is carried out by using the RFPA software. The experimental results show that the maximum plastic strain is 12 times the maximum value of elastic strain after constant-resistance tensile fracture, and the stress value fluctuates in the range of 28.01~38.71 MPa during plastic deformation, and the fluctuation is stable. The results of numerical experiments are in good agreement with Academician He Manchao’s laboratory test results, which verifies the accuracy and reliability of the numerical test method. Based on this, the numerical method is used to study the interaction principle of the constant-resistance bolt and the surrounding rock under loading and to analyze the stress and deformation and failure characteristics of anchored rock mass. The support effects of the traditional and constant-resistance bolts are comparatively analyzed. It is shown by the test results that the support effect of the constant-resistance bolt is better than that of the traditional one, which provides an effective way to control the soft rock with large deformation damage and rock burst.

     

/

返回文章
返回