• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
张江伟, 李小军, 王晓明, 迟明杰, 王玉石. 土质边坡地震稳定性状态判定方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(11): 2096-2102. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201811016
引用本文: 张江伟, 李小军, 王晓明, 迟明杰, 王玉石. 土质边坡地震稳定性状态判定方法研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(11): 2096-2102. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201811016
ZHANG Jiang-wei, LI Xiao-jun, WANG Xiao-ming, CHI Ming-jie, WANG Yu-shi. Method for judging seismic stability state of soil slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(11): 2096-2102. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201811016
Citation: ZHANG Jiang-wei, LI Xiao-jun, WANG Xiao-ming, CHI Ming-jie, WANG Yu-shi. Method for judging seismic stability state of soil slopes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(11): 2096-2102. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201811016

土质边坡地震稳定性状态判定方法研究

Method for judging seismic stability state of soil slopes

  • 摘要: 基于有限元强度折减法,对地震作用下土质边坡稳定性状态判定方法进行了研究。探讨了地震作用下坡体内部等效塑性应变区贯通率的计算方法,并利用有限元计算和统计分析方法建立了地震作用下坡体内部等效塑性应变区贯通率与边坡动力安全系数的对应关系。根据《建筑边坡工程技术规范》(GB50330—2013)中边坡稳定性状态与边坡安全系数的对应关系,从而实现了利用坡体内部等效塑性应变区贯通率来判别边坡地震稳定性状态的方法。结果表明:当等效塑性应变区贯通率K=100% 时对应边坡稳定性状态为不稳定,当等效塑性应变区贯通率100%>K≥90% 时对应边坡稳定性状态为欠稳定,等效塑性应变区贯通率90%>K≥85% 时对应边坡稳定性状态为基本稳定,等效塑性应变区贯通率K<85% 时对应边坡稳定性状态为稳定。研究结果对于震后边坡稳定性的快速评价将具有重要的借鉴意义。

     

    Abstract: Based on the strength reduction FEM, the method for judging the stability state of soil slopes under earthquake action is analyzed. The length ratio of equivalent plastic strain zone in the slope is defined, and the corresponding relationship between the length ratio of equivalent plastic strain zone in the slope under earthquake and the safety factor is established through statistical analysis. Then, according to the corresponding relationship between the stability and safety factor of slopes in the Chinese national standard “Technical code for building slope engineering” (GB50330—2013), the method for judging the stability of the slopes under earthquake by the length ratio of equivalent plastic strain zone is realized. The results show that when the length ratio of equivalent plastic strain zone is 100%, the slope is instable; when it is between 90% and 100%, the slope is understable; when it is between 85% and 90%, the slope is basically stable; and when it is below 85%, the slope is stable. The results may have a great reference value to the rapid evaluation work of seismic hazards of slopes.

     

/

返回文章
返回