• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
魏汝龙. 软粘土的有效应力剪阻角[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1989, 11(2): 26-34.
引用本文: 魏汝龙. 软粘土的有效应力剪阻角[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1989, 11(2): 26-34.
Wei Rulong. Effective Angle of Shearing Resistance for Soft Clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(2): 26-34.
Citation: Wei Rulong. Effective Angle of Shearing Resistance for Soft Clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1989, 11(2): 26-34.

软粘土的有效应力剪阻角

Effective Angle of Shearing Resistance for Soft Clay

  • 摘要: 本文提出一种方法,用来对固结不排水试验中的预应力效应进行校正,其原理如下:按照“真强度”概念,粘土的抗剪强度可分为两部分。一部分是真凝聚力Ce,它是土的含水量或孔隙比的函数;另一部分是真内摩阻力σnf'tgФe,其中Фe为真内摩阻角,它是不随含水景而变的常数。在固结不排水试验中,试样在固结压力下固结到一定的含水量,然后不排水剪切。因此,在破坏时,破坏面将有相应于该面上法向有效应力的真内摩阻力,以及相应于固结压力的真凝聚力,而该固结压力由于剪切过程中孔隙压力的产生将大于破坏面上的法向有效应力。而在排水试验中,则这两部分强度均对应于破坏时的有效应力。这样,为了比较上述两种试验得出的结果,应该将固结不排水试验中的真凝聚力也校正到对应于破坏而上法向有效应力下的数值。利用本文提出的方法可以证明,在正常压密的软粘土中tgφd′=ξ+tgφe和tgφd′=((cosφe+(2Af-1+sinφe)tgφe))/((cosφe+(2Af-1+sinφe)tgφ′))-tgφ′其中 Af是孔隙压力系数;ξ是真凝聚系数;Фd'是对固结不排水试验结果进行校正后得出的有效应力剪阻角,它与由排水试验得出的Фd完全等同。

     

    Abstract: A method is proposed to correct the consolidated-undrained test results for the prestress effect, and its underlying principle is described. According to the "true shear strength" concept, the shear strength of clay can be divided into two components: one is the true cohesion Ce which is a function of the water content or void ratio of the clay; and the other is the true internal friction σnf’tgφe where (?)e is the true angle of internal friction which is a constant independent of the water content of the clay. In the consolidated-undrained test, the specimen has been consolidated to a certain water content under the consolidation pressure and then sheared with constant water content. Hence, regarding to the shear strength determined in this test, there should be a true internal friction corresponding to the effective normal stress on the failure plane and a true cohesion corresponding to the consolidation pressure which is larger than the effective normal stress on the failure plane due to the development of pore pressure in the shearing process. As to the shear strength mobilized in drained test, both of these two components are related with the effective normal stress on the failure plane. Therefore, in order to compare the results of consolidated-undrained test with those of drained test, the true cohesion mobilized in the consolidated-undrained test should be corrected corresponding to the effective normal stress on the failure plane.It is shown by the proposed method that in normally consolidated soft claytg(?)d’ = ξ + tg(?)e andtg(?)d’=cos(?)e+(2Af-1+sin(?)e)tg(?)e/cos(?)e+(2Af-1+sin(?)e)tg(?)’tg(?)’where Af is the Skempton’s pore pressure coefficient; ξ is the coefficient of true cohesion; and (?)d’ is the corrected angle of shearing resistance in terms of effective stress obtained from the consolidated-undrained test which is identical with pd obtained from the drained test.

     

/

返回文章
返回