• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
沈珠江, 易进栋. 海滩软土路基的固结变形分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1987, 6(6): 39-45.
引用本文: 沈珠江, 易进栋. 海滩软土路基的固结变形分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1987, 6(6): 39-45.
Shen Zhujiang, Yi Jindong. Comparison of Models in Deformation Analysis of Beach Soft Ground under Embankment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987, 6(6): 39-45.
Citation: Shen Zhujiang, Yi Jindong. Comparison of Models in Deformation Analysis of Beach Soft Ground under Embankment[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987, 6(6): 39-45.

海滩软土路基的固结变形分析

Comparison of Models in Deformation Analysis of Beach Soft Ground under Embankment

  • 摘要: 本文用三种应力应变模式,即变弹性模式、剑桥模式和本文第一作者建议的双屈服面模式(简称南水模式)计算了福建省厦门东渡港区一路堤软基在施工填筑期间及堤顶加载试验期间的沉降、水平位移及孔隙水压力分布。通过计算结果与原体观测结果的对比可得到以下结论:南水模式估计的体积变形和形状变形比较适中,计算的沉降和水平位移均比其它两种模式更符合实际。计算结果还表明砂井加固有明显效果。利用现代计算技术进行软土工程设计,本文提供一个很好的经验。

     

    Abstract: Three stress-strain models, i.e. variable elastic, Cambridge and double hardening model proposed by the first author, have been used in the finite element analysis based on Biot's theory of soft ground under a railway embankment constructed on the beach of Xiamen, Fujian. It is concluded from the comparison of computed results with the observation that the best estimation of settlement and lateral displacement is obtained with the first author's model, while the Cambridge model underestimates settlement and the elastic model overestimates both settlement and lateral displacement.

     

/

返回文章
返回