• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
孙祥, 杨子荣, 赵忠英. 主应力方向地质力学分析法的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(1): 81-83.
引用本文: 孙祥, 杨子荣, 赵忠英. 主应力方向地质力学分析法的应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(1): 81-83.
SUN Xiang, YANG Zirong, ZHAO Zhongying. Application of geomechanical analytic approach of the principal stress orientation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(1): 81-83.
Citation: SUN Xiang, YANG Zirong, ZHAO Zhongying. Application of geomechanical analytic approach of the principal stress orientation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(1): 81-83.

主应力方向地质力学分析法的应用

Application of geomechanical analytic approach of the principal stress orientation

  • 摘要: 针对地应力场测量给出的区域最大主应力方向常常有争执,且不同的测量方法结果也不同。采用共轭剪节理和断层面产状、擦痕侧伏角及移位符号综合确定主应力轴,并指出两组共轭剪节理所夹钝角压也可能为压缩区,其判别方法采用羽裂判断法和位错方向判断法。工程中的应用表明:工程区最大主应力方向基本为EW,除测点号6,7,8,12外,实测地应力值基本为EW,本方法可用来快速检验地应力测量值是否准确。

     

    Abstract: Because there was dissension in the maximum principal stress orientation obtained by in-situ stress measurements by different results measurements,the principal stress axis was determined by conjugate joints,fault occurrence,rake angle and shift symbol of fault slip.Plumose fracture and orientation of dislocation was applied to find out whether sharp angle zone or obtuse angle zone between two groups of conjugate joints was compressive zone.The method was applied in Dahuofang reservoir conveying-water engineering and the results indicated that the orientation of the maximum principal stress was nearly EW and identical with the measured data except the measuring points 6,7,8 and 12.The present method could be used to verify whether the measured data was exact or not.

     

/

返回文章
返回