• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
张达德, 黄顺隆, 杨冈顺. 柔性与硬性地工格网在砂土与风化泥岩围压下之力学特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1998, 20(3): 54-60.
引用本文: 张达德, 黄顺隆, 杨冈顺. 柔性与硬性地工格网在砂土与风化泥岩围压下之力学特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1998, 20(3): 54-60.
Dave Ta teh Chang, Sung Lung Huang, Gang Shun Yang. Behavior of flexible and stiff geogrids under confined condition of sand and weathered mudstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1998, 20(3): 54-60.
Citation: Dave Ta teh Chang, Sung Lung Huang, Gang Shun Yang. Behavior of flexible and stiff geogrids under confined condition of sand and weathered mudstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1998, 20(3): 54-60.

柔性与硬性地工格网在砂土与风化泥岩围压下之力学特性

Behavior of flexible and stiff geogrids under confined condition of sand and weathered mudstone

  • 摘要: 地工格网(以下称格网)用於加劲土壤时,除考虑无围压下的张力行为之外,围压下之力学性质更是设计考量的重点。实际工程应用而言,基於经济考虑,期以现地土壤作为回填材料。本研究分别以拉出、围压抗张与直剪三种试验来探讨格网放土壤中之力学行为;并利用凝聚性泥岩与非凝聚性细砂作为回填材料,评估两种回填材料对加劲成效之影响。结果显示,柔性格网之肋条在拉出过程中易扭曲,造成主应力面旋转的现象,以致拉出阻抗大放硬性格网;围压下格网抗张的应力-应变行为可分为三阶段,即束制阻抗期、张力发展期与破坏期。束制阻抗期大都於3%应变内即已完成;在低围压情况拉出阻抗达20%~60%之拉出强度(相同应变),在高围压下达150%。由直接剪力试验结果可以预测:(a)格网/泥岩加劲结构-低围压时,剪力破坏面应通过格网/泥岩之界面;而高围压时,剪力破坏面应通过泥岩上体。(b)格网/细砂加劲结构-低围压与高围压下剪力破坏面应通过格网/细砂之界面。

     

    Abstract: One of the most important design considerations for using geogrids in reinforced soil is their mechanical properties with and without soil codrinement. Therefore, pullout tests, confined tests and direct shear tests were used in this study to investigate the mechanical behavior of geogrids in soil. To use the soil in-situ as the backfill materical is the most economical consideration. Cohesive, weathered mudstone and sandy soil were used in this study for comparison purpose. The results show that the transvend ribs of nexible geogrids tend to twist during pullout. This rotation of the main stress surface causes the pullout resistance of flexible geogrids to be higher than that of stiff ones. The development of confined tensile stress -strain behavior of geogrids can be divided into three stages: pulIout resistance, tensile strength, and failure. The pullout resistance is usually exhausted at strains of 3% or less. Under low confining pressure, pullout resisIance can reach between 20% and 60% of the geogrids tensile strength.While confining pressure is high, pullout resistance reaches about 150% (at the same strain) of tensile strength. The result from direct shear tests indicates that for low confining pressure, the shear plane would pass through the geogrid - mudstone interface; while at high codrining pressure it would pass through the soil mass itself. With fine sandy soil under both low and high confining pressures, the shear failure plane would always pass through the interface of sand and geogrids.

     

/

返回文章
返回