• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
刘俊城, 谭勇, 樊冬冬. 深厚富水砂土地铁深基坑变形性状及频发地连墙渗漏灾害分析[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241269
引用本文: 刘俊城, 谭勇, 樊冬冬. 深厚富水砂土地铁深基坑变形性状及频发地连墙渗漏灾害分析[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241269
Analyses of deformation behaviors of subway excavations and frequent through-wall leaking hazards in water-rich sandy strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241269
Citation: Analyses of deformation behaviors of subway excavations and frequent through-wall leaking hazards in water-rich sandy strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20241269

深厚富水砂土地铁深基坑变形性状及频发地连墙渗漏灾害分析

Analyses of deformation behaviors of subway excavations and frequent through-wall leaking hazards in water-rich sandy strata

  • 摘要: 为探究深厚富水砂土地铁深基坑变形性状以及频发地连墙渗漏灾害特征,首先建立了深基坑变形和渗漏事例数据库以开展全面统计分析,得到了围护结构和坑外地表变形规律并识别出关键影响因素。其次,提出了富水砂土深基坑穿墙渗漏灾害的新型分类方法,进而揭示了灾害主要诱因并总结了有效应对措施。统计分析表明:(1)墙体最大侧移(δ_hm)范围为(0.03%~0.48%)H(H为开挖深度),δ_hm大小受到角部效应、降水模式、墙趾埋置条件以及墙体暴露长度等因素的影响;(2)地表沉降剖面为典型凹槽形,最大沉降(δ_vm)为0.26%H_e(H_e为最终开挖深度)并距墙体约0.5H_e;(3)地连墙渗漏会导致δ_hm突增,这主要归因于动水力引起的墙背水土合力增加以及注浆压力不当两个方面;(4)渗漏引起的大部分地表沉降增量(∆δ_vl)均小于0.5%H_l并且主要影响区可扩展至坑外约2H_l范围,其中H_l为墙体渗漏深度,坑外地层扰动区呈“倒圆锥形”分布;(5)穿墙渗漏灾害可划分为三种类型:轻微渗水无土体流失、严重渗漏水轻微土体流失以及大量漏水漏砂;(6)采用“灾前预防和灾后应急处置”思路能有效控制地连墙渗漏灾害。

     

    Abstract: To explore the deformation behaviors of subway excavations in thick water-rich sandy strata and the characteristics of frequent through-wall leaking hazards, the databases of excavation deformation and through-wall leaking events were first built to carry out comprehensive statistical analyses; hence, the deformation laws of retaining walls and ground surface behind the walls were obtained, and the key influencing factors were identified. Then, a novel method for classifying through-wall leakages during deep excavation in water-rich sand was proposed; afterwards, their primary triggering factors were revealed, and the effective measures were also summarized. The statistical analyses show that: (1) The maximum lateral wall deflection, δ_hm, varied from 0.03% H (H, excavation depth) to 0.48% H; the magnitudes of δ_hm were affected by the spatial-corner effect, dewatering mode, burial condition of wall toes, and wall exposure length. (2) The profile of ground settlements was a typical concave shape, and the maximum settlement, δ_vm, was 0.26%H_e (H_e, final excavation depth), which occurred at about 0.5H_e behind the walls. (3) Through-wall leaking caused sudden increments of δ_hm, mainly attributed to the rapid increment of total lateral earth pressure induced by seepage force and/or the inappropriate grouting pressure. (4) Most of the leakage-induced settlement increments, ∆δ_vl, were less than 0.5%H_l, and the primary influence zone could be extended to about 2H_l outside the pit, in which H_l denoted the burial depth of leaky spots on the wall; besides, the shape of strata disturbed behind the walls showed a distribution of “inverted cone”. (5) Leaking hazards can be classified into three levels: minor seepage without soil loss, massive leakage with slight soil loss, and massive inrush of water and soils. (6) Through-wall leakages can be effectively controlled by following the perspective of "disaster prevention before accidents and emergency response after accidents".

     

/

返回文章
返回