• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
黄继新, 尤著刚, 姜浩, 马永浪, 雷浩. 不同卸荷措施下深覆土特大跨度明洞受力特性研究及衬砌结构变形预测[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240516
引用本文: 黄继新, 尤著刚, 姜浩, 马永浪, 雷浩. 不同卸荷措施下深覆土特大跨度明洞受力特性研究及衬砌结构变形预测[J]. 岩土工程学报. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240516
Study on the stress characteristics of deep overburden large-span cut-and-cover tunnel under different unloading methods and prediction of lining structure deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240516
Citation: Study on the stress characteristics of deep overburden large-span cut-and-cover tunnel under different unloading methods and prediction of lining structure deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20240516

不同卸荷措施下深覆土特大跨度明洞受力特性研究及衬砌结构变形预测

Study on the stress characteristics of deep overburden large-span cut-and-cover tunnel under different unloading methods and prediction of lining structure deformation

  • 摘要: 针对近年来我国西部地区普遍应用的深覆土特大跨度明洞工程,通过开展模型实验研究了EPS板和混凝土柱等卸荷措施单一或组合使用时产生的卸荷效果,分析土压力、衬砌结构内力和位移后探明了卸荷措施的卸荷机理,使用破损阶段法评估了不同卸荷措施下衬砌结构的安全性,基于多元线性回归原理求得了填土荷载作用下衬砌结构薄弱部位(拱顶和拱腰)位移预测方程。研究结果表明:无卸荷措施时明洞顶部会出现明显的土压力集中现象,明洞顶部和两侧铺设EPS板与混凝土柱相结合的卸荷方式可最大限度的减小明洞周围土压力,平均竖向土压力和平均水平土压力可分别减小40.01%和79.34%,然而,此种卸荷措施会因大幅减小水平土压力而削弱土体对衬砌结构的约束作用进而导致衬砌结构内力和位移不能降至最小,而仅在明洞顶铺设EPS板可利用回填土中的土拱效应在减小竖向土压力增幅的同时增大水平土压力增幅,加强土体对衬砌结构的约束作用,达到最优卸荷效果。填土完成后无卸荷措施时明洞顶位移为29.15mm,其薄弱部位拱顶和拱腰的弯矩分别为4111.88 kN•m和-3988.51 kN•m,在明洞顶铺设EPS板后明洞顶位移减小了50.15%,拱顶和拱腰的弯矩分别减小了77.48%和75.71%,且相较于其他卸荷措施,该措施可更有效提升结构安全性。以土压力为变量基于多元线性回归原理所得衬砌结构薄弱部位位移预测方程求得位移预测值与实际值间最大和最小误差分别为7.30%和0.28%,位移预测方程可有效应用于深覆土特大跨度明洞工程中卸荷措施研究以及卸荷参数优化。/t/n关键词:深覆土;特大断面;卸荷措施;卸荷机理;破损阶段法;多元线性回归

     

    Abstract: In response to the widespread application of large-span high-fill cut-and-cover tunnels in Western China in recent years, model experiments were conducted to study the unloading effects of EPS (expanded polystyrene) boards and concrete columns used either individually or in combination. By analyzing earth pressure, internal forces, and displacements of the lining structure, the unloading mechanisms of these measures were elucidated. The safety of the lining structure under different unloading measures was evaluated using the damage stage method. Additionally, based on the principles of multiple linear regression, predictive equations for the displacements at the weak points of the lining structure (the crown and haunches) under a load of backfill were derived. The research results indicate that without any unloading measures, there is a significant concentration of earth pressure at the top of the cut-and-cover tunnel. The unloading method that combines EPS (expanded polystyrene) boards and concrete columns at the top and sides of the tunnel can maximally reduce the surrounding earth pressure. This method reduces the average vertical and horizontal earth pressure by 40.01% and 79.34%, respectively. However, this unloading method significantly decreases horizontal earth pressure, which weakens the soil's constraining effect on the lining structure, preventing the minimization of internal forces and displacements within the lining. On the other hand, EPS boards only at the top of the tunnel leverage the soil arching effect in the backfill. On the other hand, EPS boards only at the top of the tunnel leverage the soil arching effect in the backfill, this method not only reduces the increase in vertical earth pressure but also increases the horizontal earth pressure, thereby enhancing the soil's constraining effect on the lining structure and achieving optimal unloading results. After backfilling, with no unloading measures, the displacement at the top of the cut-and-cover tunnel is 29.15mm, and the bending moments at its weak points, the crown, and haunches, are 4111.88 kN•m and -3988.51 kN•m, respectively. After installing EPS boards at the top of the tunnel, the displacement at the top decreases by 50.15%, and the bending moments at the crown and haunches decrease by 77.48% and 75.71%, respectively. Furthermore, compared to other unloading measures, this method can effectively enhance structural safety. Using earth pressure as a variable, the displacement predictive equation for weak points of the lining structure, derived based on the principles of multiple linear regression, yields maximum and minimum errors between predicted and actual displacement values of 7.30% and 0.28%, respectively. This displacement prediction equation can be effectively applied to research on unloading measures and optimization of unloading parameters in large-span high-fill cut-and-cover tunnels.

     

/

返回文章
返回