• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
余志祥, 骆泓锦, 张丽君, 骆丽茹, 金云涛, 赵雷. 考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(8): 1695-1702. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517
引用本文: 余志祥, 骆泓锦, 张丽君, 骆丽茹, 金云涛, 赵雷. 考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(8): 1695-1702. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517
YU Zhixiang, LUO Hongjin, ZHANG Lijun, LUO Liru, JIN Yuntao, ZHAO Lei. Coupling analysis method for flexible debris flow barriers considering water blocking and permeability effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1695-1702. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517
Citation: YU Zhixiang, LUO Hongjin, ZHANG Lijun, LUO Liru, JIN Yuntao, ZHAO Lei. Coupling analysis method for flexible debris flow barriers considering water blocking and permeability effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(8): 1695-1702. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE20230517

考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析方法

Coupling analysis method for flexible debris flow barriers considering water blocking and permeability effects

  • 摘要: 针对柔性防护网在黏性泥石流通过时的透水效应问题,在柔性环连网等效薄膜有限单元(FEM)的基础上,结合S-ALE和Ergun公式的欧拉-拉格朗日耦合算法,提出了Structured-ALE-FEM耦合算法(简称S-A-F方法),实现了考虑透水效应的泥石流柔性防护网耦合分析。结合USGS的泥石流柔性防护模型试验,开展了泥石流柔性防护全过程动力学分析,并与试验结果进行了对比分析。研究表明:提出的耦合方法可再现泥石流冲击、爬高及渗透堆积的全过程;与试验相比,泥石流堆积高度和堆积宽度的最大误差分别为11.9%和10.3%,泥石流浆体通过量最大差量为3.2%;柔性防护网关键部件动力响应与试验相比,右侧拉锚绳、左侧拉锚绳及网片最大变形量时程曲线误差分别为3.2%,16.4%,14.4%。与不考虑阻水效应的两种理论算法相比,S-A-F方法在泥石流冲击力峰值和泥石流浆体通过量准确度较同类其他方法提升了4.69%和17.50%。提出的S-A-F耦合方法可用于黏性泥石流柔性防护工程的设计计算。

     

    Abstract: To solve the dynamic effects of blocking and permeating water under the scouring effects of mudflow on flexible protection projects, a coupled S-ALE-FEM method considering the water blocking and permeability effects of mudflow flexible protection process is established. The equivalent thin film unit of the ring network considering the water-blocking-permeability effects is established according to the Euler-Lagrange coupling algorithm based on S-ALE and Ergun formula to realize the equivalent water-blocking-permeability quantification calculation of the dense curved beam-like metal ring network mudslide protection process. The kinetic analysis of the whole process of mudflow flexible protection is carried out in conjunction with the USGS mudflow flexible protection model tests, and the results are compared with the test ones. The study shows that the proposed coupled method can reproduce the full process inversion of debris flow impact, height climbing and infiltration accumulation. Compared with those of the tests, the maximum errors of debris flow accumulation height and accumulation width are 11.9% and 10.3%, respectively, and the maximum difference of debris flow slurry passage is 3.2%. For comparison between the tests and the dynamic response of key components of the flexible protection system, the maximum time-history errors of right side anchor rope, left side anchor rope and mesh are 3.2%, 16.4% and 14.4% respectively. Compared with those of the two theoretical algorithms not considering the water blocking effects, the accuracy of the calculated results of the peak debris flow impact force and the difference of debris flow slurry passage are improved by 4.69% and 17.50%, respectively. The S-A-F coupling method can solve the design and calculation challenges of mudflow flexible protection projects.

     

/

返回文章
返回