• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
赵云阁, 黄麟淇, 李夕兵. 岩石损伤强度及峰值强度前后阶段的声发射识别[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(10): 1908-1916. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202210017
引用本文: 赵云阁, 黄麟淇, 李夕兵. 岩石损伤强度及峰值强度前后阶段的声发射识别[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(10): 1908-1916. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202210017
ZHAO Yun-ge, HUANG Lin-qi, LI Xi-bing. Identification of stages before and after damage strength and peak strength using acoustic emission tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(10): 1908-1916. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202210017
Citation: ZHAO Yun-ge, HUANG Lin-qi, LI Xi-bing. Identification of stages before and after damage strength and peak strength using acoustic emission tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(10): 1908-1916. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202210017

岩石损伤强度及峰值强度前后阶段的声发射识别

Identification of stages before and after damage strength and peak strength using acoustic emission tests

  • 摘要: 岩石损伤强度和峰值强度是岩石工程中两项重要指标,通过声发射识别该两项指标更具工程应用价值,为了解决目前采用声发射试验难以识别的问题,开展了相应的试验和识别方法研究。选用典型的红砂岩进行声发射试验,首先根据声发射事件数表征的损伤变量,将岩石压缩破坏全过程划分为损伤稳定演化(损伤强度前)、损伤加剧演化(损伤与峰值强度之间)和峰后残余强度3个阶段。根据岩石声发射参数与损伤状态之间Spearman相关性系数分析结果,优选了用于识别的声发射参数,进而建立了基于SVM分类原理的岩石损伤强度及峰值强度前后阶段的识别模型。不同核函数与参数优化算法组合研究表明:RBF核函数与PSO算法组合时识别效果最优,且识别准确率随着测试岩样与训练岩样波速差异的减小而增加;波速差异较小时,3个阶段的识别准确率均超过96%。研究结果可为通过声发射监测识别工程实际中岩石所处的强度阶段提供借鉴。

     

    Abstract: The damage strength and the peak strength are the important indexes for rock engineering. The two indexes identified by the acoustic emission (AE) tests are of high practical value in engineering application. As it is difficult to identify the two indexes by the AE tests, the corresponding identification method is studied based on the laboratory AE tests. Firstly, the AE tests on typical red sandstone samples are carried out, and the whole process of the uniaxial compression tests can be divided into three stages on the subject to damage variables characterized by the number of AE events. The three stages include the stable evolution period of damage (before damage strength), the aggravated evolution period of damage (between damage and peak strengths) and the residual strength period after the peak strength. The appropriate AE parameters for identification are selected based on the Spearman correlation coefficient between AE and damage state. Then the identification model is established based on the principle of SVM classification. It can be used to identify the stages before and after the damage strength and peak strength of rock. The RBF kernel function and the PSO algorithm are determined as the optimal algorithm based on the analysis of different kernel functions and parameter optimization algorithms. The itentification accuracy increases with the decrease of the difference of wave velocity between the test and training samples. With the close wave velocity between the test and training samples, the identification accuracy of the three stages is over 96%. The research results may provide reference for identifying the strength states of in-situ rock through AE monitoring.

     

/

返回文章
返回