• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
杨步云, 陈俊涛, 肖明. 跨断层地下隧洞衬砌结构地震响应及损伤机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(11): 2078-2087. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202011013
引用本文: 杨步云, 陈俊涛, 肖明. 跨断层地下隧洞衬砌结构地震响应及损伤机理研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(11): 2078-2087. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202011013
YANG Bu-yun, CHEN Jun-tao, XIAO Ming. Seismic response and damage mechanism of lining structures for underground tunnels across fault[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(11): 2078-2087. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202011013
Citation: YANG Bu-yun, CHEN Jun-tao, XIAO Ming. Seismic response and damage mechanism of lining structures for underground tunnels across fault[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(11): 2078-2087. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE202011013

跨断层地下隧洞衬砌结构地震响应及损伤机理研究

Seismic response and damage mechanism of lining structures for underground tunnels across fault

  • 摘要: 针对衬砌与围岩动力相互作用特点,建立了一种考虑衬砌与围岩非连续变形的动接触力算法,并将该算法应用于拉哇工程某跨断层地下隧洞抗震稳定计算。首先,研究了断层厚度和倾角对隧洞衬砌应力与位移地震响应的影响;然后,研究了接触作用及断层对于衬砌地震响应及损伤破坏特性的影响。研究结果表明:断层的存在加剧了衬砌地震响应,表现为断层处衬砌的应力和位移明显大于其他部位的应力和位移;断层厚度和倾角的不同对于断层处衬砌的地震响应有明显影响,衬砌地震响应随着断层厚度的减小逐渐增大,当断层倾角为45°时衬砌地震响应最大;围岩对于衬砌的约束作用可以有效降低衬砌的破坏;断层部位的衬砌损伤比其他部位严重,而拱肩和拱座为隧洞抗震薄弱部位;由数值计算结果归纳总结了断层处衬砌损伤破坏的3种典型模式,并根据相应损伤机理进行了合理解释。

     

    Abstract: According to the dynamic interaction characteristics of lining and surrounding rock, a dynamic contact force method considering the discontinuous deformation between linings and surrounding rock is established. This method is used to calculate the antiseimic stability of an underground tunnel across fault in Lawa Hydropower Station project. Firstly, the influences of fault thickness and dip angle on the stress and displacement of tunnel linings under earthquake are investigated. Then, the influences of contact and fault on the seismic response and damage characteristics of the linings are investigated. The numerical results indicate that the existence of fault aggravates the seismic reaction of the linings, which shows that the stress and displacement of the linings at the fault are greater than those at other positions. The difference of fault thickness and dip angle has a significant influence on the seismic response of the linings at the fault. The seismic response of the linings increases with the decrease of the fault thickness, and the seismic response of the linings is the largest when the dip angle is 45°. The restraint effect of surrounding rock on the linings can effectively reduce their damage. The damage of linings at fault is more serious than that at other parts, and arch shoulders and arch abutments are the weak parts of the tunnel. Three typical damage patterns of the linings at fault are deduced from the simulated results and can be reasonably explicated by the corresponding damage mechanisms.

     

/

返回文章
返回