• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
陈少杰, 顾晓强, 高广运. 土体小应变剪切模量的现场和室内试验对比及工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(S2): 133-136. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2034
引用本文: 陈少杰, 顾晓强, 高广运. 土体小应变剪切模量的现场和室内试验对比及工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2019, 41(S2): 133-136. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2034
CHEN Shao-jie, GU Xiao-qiang, GAO Guang-yun. Comparison and application of small strain shear moduli from field and laboratory measurements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S2): 133-136. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2034
Citation: CHEN Shao-jie, GU Xiao-qiang, GAO Guang-yun. Comparison and application of small strain shear moduli from field and laboratory measurements[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41(S2): 133-136. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2019S2034

土体小应变剪切模量的现场和室内试验对比及工程应用

Comparison and application of small strain shear moduli from field and laboratory measurements

  • 摘要: 土体小应变剪切模量G0在场地地震响应和基坑变形等计算分析中有着重要作用。统计了上海典型土层的室内共振柱试验和现场原位波速测试测得的小应变剪切模量,给出了两种试验方法下的G0的经验公式,并对比分析了室内试验和现场原位测试结果的差异。研究结果表明土体的G0值主要由土体类别、孔隙比和平均有效应力决定,且现场试验的结果远高于室内试验的结果。进一步采用HS-Small本构模型对上海新金桥广场基坑工程的开挖变形进行数值模拟,分析了小应变剪切模量对于基坑工程变形的影响。分析结果表明,采用现场原位测试测得的小应变剪切模量进行基坑变形计算的结果与现场变形监测数据更为接近。

     

    Abstract: The small-strain shear modulus plays an important role in the calculations of ground seismic response and deformation in deep excavations. The values of the small strain shear modulus G0 of Shanghai soils by field and laboratory tests are investigated and compared, and empirical formulas are proposed to predict the values of G0. The results indicate that G0 mainly depends on the soil type, void ratio and mean confining pressure. The values of G0 from field tests are considerately higher than those from laboratory tests. The correlation between the small strain shear moduli from field and laboratory is also proposed. The numerical analysis is also carried out to calculate the deformation in a deep excavation in Shanghai. The small strain hardening model (HSS) is used, together with the measured small strain shear modulus. The values of G0 are essential for the deformation of the excavation, and the predicted deformation using the G0 value from field measurement is more accurate than that using the laboratory data based on the measured deformation in the excavation.

     

/

返回文章
返回