基于Davidenkov骨架曲线模型的修正不规则加卸载准则与等效剪应变算法及其验证

赵丁凤; 阮滨; 陈国兴; 徐令宇; 庄海洋

doi:10.11779/CJGE201705013

基于Davidenkov骨架曲线模型的修正不规则加卸载准则与等效剪应变算法及其验证 English Version

赵丁凤^{1, 2},
阮滨^{1, 2},
陈国兴^1,2, ,,
徐令宇^{1, 2},
庄海洋^{1, 2}

1. 南京工业大学岩土工程研究所,江苏南京 210009;
2. 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏南京 210009

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（51378258,51438004）; 国家科技重大专项项目（2013ZX06002001-9）; 国家青年自然科学基金项目（51508271）; 江苏省青年自然科学基金项目（BK20150958）

详细信息

作者简介:
赵丁凤(1989- ),女,博士研究生,主要从事城市地下结构抗震研究。E-mail: zdf0801@163.com。

通讯作者:
陈国兴，E-mail：gxc6307@163.com

中图分类号: TU435
计量
- 文章访问数: 773
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 468
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-02-24
- 发布日期: 2017-05-24

Validation of modified irregular loading-unloading rules based on Davidenkov skeleton curve and its equivalent shear strain algorithm implemented in ABAQUS

ZHAO Ding-feng^{1, 2},
RUAN Bin^{1, 2},
CHEN Guo-xing^1,2, ,,
XU Ling-yu^{1, 2},
ZHUANG Hai-yang^{1, 2}

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China;
2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, China;

摘要

摘要: 非等幅循环荷载作用下,采用“扩展Masing”法则修正应力-应变滞回曲线时,程序的实现过程中需要预留大量的状态变量。针对该问题,提出了Davidenkov本构模型的不规则加卸载修正准则,以代替“扩展Masing”法则中的“上大圈”准则。通过等效剪应变算法的比选,给出了加卸载判据简单且精度更高的等效剪应变算法。基于ABAQUS软件的显式模块,开发了基于不规则加卸载准则的修正Davidenkov本构模型的显式子程序模块,适用于大规模二维和三维场地非线性地震效应分析。选取Mississippi湾500 m深的钻孔作为计算模型,通过与一维场地非线性地震效应分析专业程序Deepsoil计算得到的输入不同强度地震动下的地表峰值加速度、PGA=0.65g的场地地震反应的对比分析,佐证了提出的Davidenkov本构模型不规则加卸载准则与等效剪应变算法的合理性。
- 修正不规则加卸载准则 /
- Davidenkov本构模型 /
- 等效剪应变算法 /
- 场地地震效应 /
- 非线性
Abstract: Under irregular cyclic loadings, adopting the extended Masing criterion to modify the stress-strain hysteresis curves will bring about the program with a large number of state variables. In this paper, the initial stress-strain skeleton curve is simulated by the Davidenkov model, and the simplified loading-reloading rules are proposed instead of the upper boundary rules of the extended Masing criterion. Through comparison, an equivalent strain algorithm with simple unloading judgment standard and higher precision is proposed. Synthesizing computational accuracy and efficiency of large-scale nonlinear seismic site effect analyses, a three-dimensional explicit subroutine of the Davidenkov model with simplified loading-reloading rules is developed in ABAQUS/Explicit module. It is applicable to both two- and three-dimensional seismic site effect analyses. Finally, a two-dimensional numerical simulation for a soil column 500 m thick of Mississippi Embayment is carried out, the peak ground accelerations versus different seismic levels, site seismic responses for Kobe earthquake record of PGA 0.65g are compared with those computed by one-dimensional nonlinear seismic site response analysis program Deepsoil. The results show that the modified irregular loading-unloading rules based on the Davidenkov skeleton curve and the proposed equivalent strain algorithm are rational and valid.
- modified irregular loading-unloading rules /
- Davidenkov constitutive model /
- equivalent strain algorithm /
- seismic site effect /
- nonlinearity

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	陈国兴, 庄海洋. 基于 Davidenkov 骨架曲线的土体动力本构关系及其参数研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005, 27(8): 860-864. (CHEN Guo-xing, ZHUANG Hai-yang. Developed nonlinear dynamic constitutive relations of soils based on Davidenkov skeleton curve[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(8): 860-864. (in Chinese))
[2]	WANG Z, FAN G, HAN J, et al. Reference strain γ r in hyperbolic modeling of dynamic shear modulus of soils[C]// Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering. Chengdu, 2013.
[3]	CHEN G, JIN D, ZHU J, et al. Nonlinear analysis on seismic site response of fuzhou basin, china[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2015, 105(2A): 928-949.
[4]	PYKE R M. Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1979, 105(6): 715-726.
[5]	大崎順彦, 原昭夫, 清田芳治. 地盤震動解析のための土の動力学的モデルの提案と解析例[C]//第5回日本地震工学シンポジウム. 东京, 1978: 697-704. (COHSAKI Y, HARA A, KIYOTA Y. Stress-strain model of soil for seimic analysis[C]// Proceedings of the Fifth Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium. Tokyo, 1978: 697-704. (in Japanese))
[6]	MARTIN P P, SEED H B. One-dimensional dynamic ground response analyses[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1982, 108(7): 935-952.
[7]	PISANÒ F, JEREMIĆ B. Simulating stiffness degradation and damping in soils via a simple visco-elastic-plastic model[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 63(1): 98-109.
[8]	DASSAULT SYSTÈMES. ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual, rersion6.10[CP/DK]. Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 2010.
[9]	BORJA R I, LIN C H, SAMA K M, et al. Modelling non-linear ground response of non-liquefiable soils[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(1): 63-83.
[10]	庄海洋, 陈国兴, 梁艳仙, 等. 土体动非线性黏弹性模型及其ABAQUS软件的实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(3): 436-442. (ZHUANG Hai-yang, CHEN Guo-xing, LIANG Yan-xian, et al. A developed dynamic viscoelastic constitutive relations of soil and implemented by ABAQUS software[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(3): 436-442. (in Chinese))
[11]	HASHASH Y M A, Park D. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment[J]. Engineering Geology, 2001, 62(1): 185-206.
[12]	HASHASH Y M A. Deepsoil v5.1, user manual and tutorial 2002—2012[CP/DK]. Urbana Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, 2012.

施引文献(9)

期刊类型引用(4)

1.	王亚辉. 深厚冲积地层护滩堤原型观测技术. 汕头大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(01): 13-22 . 百度学术
2.	刘楠. 城市高边坡开挖稳定性分析及防护方案设计. 黑龙江交通科技. 2022(10): 58-60 . 百度学术
3.	马江萍. 建筑垃圾-粉煤灰双掺混凝土桩地基处理性能研究. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2020(03): 67-71 . 百度学术
4.	王迪，王宏权，王晓飞，徐惠民，张飞. 基于极限分析上限法双层土坡稳定性分析. 水利与建筑工程学报. 2020(04): 209-214 . 百度学术