• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
  • Scopus数据库收录期刊
刘爱民, 梁爱华, 尹长权. 整体式塑料排水板与普通塑料排水板加固效果对比试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(zk1): 130-133. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S1024
引用本文: 刘爱民, 梁爱华, 尹长权. 整体式塑料排水板与普通塑料排水板加固效果对比试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(zk1): 130-133. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S1024
LIU Ai-min, LIANG Ai-hua, YIN Chang-quan. Comparative tests on reinforcement effects of integral and ordinary plastic drainage boards[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(zk1): 130-133. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S1024
Citation: LIU Ai-min, LIANG Ai-hua, YIN Chang-quan. Comparative tests on reinforcement effects of integral and ordinary plastic drainage boards[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(zk1): 130-133. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2016S1024

整体式塑料排水板与普通塑料排水板加固效果对比试验

Comparative tests on reinforcement effects of integral and ordinary plastic drainage boards

  • 摘要: 目前对于新吹填的淤泥和流泥等超软土地基,一般认为采用防淤堵的整体式塑料排水板比采用普通塑料排水板加固效果更加理想;而对于新吹填的黏土和粉质黏土等土性较好的软土地基,现场试验对比结果表明,采用整体式塑料排水板和普通塑料排水板加固效果相近,也就是说整体式塑料排水板的优势并不明显。

     

    Abstract: At present, for the soft soil ground such as newly reclaimed silt and mud flows, it is generally considered that the integral plastic drainage board with anti-clogging reinforced effect is more desirable than the ordinary plastic drainage board; while for the soft soil ground such as newly reclaimed clay and silty clay, the comparative field test results show that the integral plastic drainage board and the general plastic drainage board have similar reinforced effects, that is to say the advantages of the integral plastic drainage board is not obvious.

     

/

返回文章
返回